Skim the abstract and conclusion first
Highlight the abstract and ask Vezz me for the 3-part structure: Problem, Method, and Quantitative Finding.
How to summarize and question research papers in Chrome without losing context.
Read arXiv preprints, peer-reviewed HTML papers, and literature reviews faster. Highlight abstracts, methodology sections, or statistical tables and question them in place.
Best fit
Best for graduate students, scientists, and R&D engineers conducting literature reviews in Chrome or Firefox.
On-screen walkthrough
How this looks on a real webpage.
Instead of switching tabs and rebuilding context, highlight the exact passage that slowed you down and press your shortcut (default: Ctrl+Shift+X or Cmd+Shift+X on macOS, fully customizable in settings).
1. Highlighted on page (arXiv HTML Paper — Attention Is All You Need (Methodology))
We suspect that for large values of d_k, the dot products grow large in magnitude, pushing the softmax function into regions where it has extremely small gradients. To counteract this effect, we scale the dot products by 1 / sqrt(d_k).
Ctrl+Shift+X“Why does a large dot product cause small gradients in softmax, and why specifically 1/sqrt(d_k)?”
2. Vezz me on-screen answer overlay
1. Softmax saturation: When one logit is much larger than the others, `exp(z)` pushes its probability close to 1.0 and all others close to 0.0. In that flat tail of the curve, the derivative `p * (1 - p)` approaches zero, starving backpropagation.
2. Why `sqrt(d_k)`: If `q` and `k` have independent zero-mean, unit-variance components, their dot product has mean 0 and variance `d_k` (standard deviation `sqrt(d_k)`). Dividing by `sqrt(d_k)` restores unit variance regardless of head dimension.
3. Suggested follow-up questions in thread
- “What breaks if `q` and `k` do not have unit variance after training starts?”
- “How does FlashAttention handle this scaling factor?”
- “Summarize this intuition in one sentence for my literature review notes.”
Importable Prompt Preset
Use this custom prompt in Vezz me.
Copy the system prompt below or download the .json preset file to import it directly into the Vezz me Chrome or Firefox extension.
Vezz me Custom Prompt Preset
Research Paper Method & Claim Auditor
Prevents sycophantic summaries that repeat a paper's abstract as settled fact.
You are a rigorous academic peer reviewer and research tutor. For the selected passage: 1) State what the authors actually did or claimed in plain English, 2) Identify the underlying mathematical or methodological assumption, and 3) Point out any limitations, confounders, or what needs empirical verification.Step-by-step workflow
How to run this workflow in place.
Interrogate the methodology and equations
When you hit a dense derivation, identification strategy, or ablation table, highlight that specific paragraph and press Ctrl+Shift+X.
Separate direct findings from author speculation
Ask follow-up questions to distinguish what the data proved from what the discussion section extrapolated.
Key details
Why this approach works better than switching tabs.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about academic & research workflow.
Does Vezz me work on arXiv HTML papers and PubMed Central?
Yes. Any paper rendered in the browser with selectable text (including `arxiv.org/abs/`, `arxiv.org/html/`, `ar5iv`, PubMed, Nature, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library) works seamlessly with Vezz me.
Can Vezz me explain mathematical notation and Greek symbols in papers?
Yes. Highlight the equation or the sentence defining the variables, press Ctrl+Shift+X, and ask Vezz me to define each symbol in the context of the paper.
Related workflows & guides
Explore connected pages.
Ready to try this workflow on your own reading?
Install Vezz me free, highlight text on any webpage, and press your customizable shortcut (default: Ctrl+Shift+X or Cmd+Shift+X on Mac) to get an answer right beside the source.
